Construction Submittal Turnaround: How Submittal Speed Affects Project Schedule and Quality
Submittal turnaround time substantially affects project schedule and quality. Submittals include shop drawings (fabricator detail drawings), product data (specifications and cut sheets), samples (physical samples for selection), mock-ups (full-size assemblies), and similar. Quality submittals plus timely review enable construction to proceed; delayed submittals delay procurement and installation. Specific best practices reduce turnaround. Understanding submittal management helps construction firms maintain schedule.
This post covers construction submittal turnaround.
Multiple submittal types:
Submittal types
- Shop drawings (fabricator details)
- Product data (specifications, cut sheets)
- Samples (physical examples)
- Mock-ups (full-size assemblies)
- Manufacturer's instructions
- Test reports
- Specific to specifications
Multiple submittal types per specifications. Shop drawings showing fabricator's interpretation — substantial for steel, custom millwork, glazing. Product data including specifications and cut sheets confirming product compliance. Samples physical examples for selection (paint chips, fabric swatches, finishes). Mock-ups full-size assemblies for substantial complex elements (wall types, façade systems). Manufacturer's instructions for installation. Test reports for materials and assemblies. Specific to specifications.
Review time per contract:
Submittal review time
- Contract specifies (typically 14-21 days)
- Specific to designer team
- Substantial submittals longer typically
- Resubmittals additional time
- Specific to AIA contracts
- Schedule impact when delayed
Submittal review time per contract terms. Contract specifies typically 14-21 days for review. Specific to designer team capacity and complexity. Substantial submittals longer typically (multi-discipline coordination). Resubmittals additional time when revisions needed. Specific to AIA contracts which provide framework. Schedule impact when delayed — procurement and installation delayed.
Best practices reduce turnaround:
Best practices
- Quality submittals first time (not multiple rounds)
- Submittal schedule (substantial projects)
- Pre-submittal coordination
- Specific to specs (no extra information)
- Tracking systems
- Substantial vs minor classification
Best practices reduce submittal turnaround. Quality submittals first time vs multiple rounds substantially affects schedule. Submittal schedule on substantial projects coordinating timing across all submittals. Pre-submittal coordination between subcontractors and GC catching issues. Specific to specs without extra information confusing review. Tracking systems through Procore, Newforma, others showing status. Substantial vs minor classification supporting prioritization.
Get AP insights in your inbox
A short monthly roundup of construction AP + accounting posts. No spam, ever.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Substitutions complicate:
Substitutions
- Proposed substitution from specified
- Substantial documentation required
- Designer review for equivalence
- Schedule impact when not pre-approved
- Specific procedures
- Specific to specifications
Substitutions complicate submittal process. Proposed substitution from specified product (cost, schedule, availability reasons). Substantial documentation required showing equivalence to specified. Designer review for equivalence — takes time evaluating. Schedule impact when not pre-approved through preconstruction. Specific procedures per contract for substitution review. Specific to specifications and contract.
Long-lead items priority:
Long-lead items
- Custom items long fabrication
- Specialty equipment
- Imported materials
- Priority submittals
- Specific to schedule
- Substantial schedule impact when delayed
Long-lead items priority for submittal review. Custom items long fabrication times (custom curtain wall, specialty millwork, custom equipment). Specialty equipment with substantial fabrication. Imported materials with shipping time. Priority submittals for these items. Specific to schedule — long-lead items often critical path. Substantial schedule impact when delayed.
Submittal management quality substantially affects project schedule — quality submittals plus timely review enable smooth execution; deficient produces substantial schedule slips. Quality preconstruction with submittal schedule produces best outcomes. Proactive coordination between GC and design team prevents bottlenecks. Worth substantial attention to submittal discipline.
Submittal turnaround substantially affects project schedule. Multiple submittal types per specifications. Review time per contract typically 14-21 days. Best practices include quality first submittals, submittal schedule, pre-coordination. Substitutions complicate process. Long-lead items priority. For construction firms, quality submittal management supports schedule and quality. Quality preconstruction and proactive coordination produce best outcomes. Worth substantial attention as project execution foundation.
Written by
Marcus Reyes
Construction Industry Lead
Spent twelve years running AP at a $120M general contractor before joining Covinly. Lives in the world of AIA G702/G703, retainage schedules, and lien waiver deadlines. Writes about the construction-specific workflows that generic AP tools get wrong.
View all posts