HUD Section 3: Hiring Preferences for Low-Income Residents on HUD-Assisted Construction
Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 requires that economic opportunities generated by HUD-assisted construction — to the greatest extent feasible — be directed to low-income persons, particularly those living in the project area, and to business concerns that provide economic opportunities to those low-income persons. The requirement applies to Section 3 Covered Projects receiving HUD funding above specified thresholds, and it flows down from prime contractors through all tiers of subcontractors.
For contractors working on HUD-assisted construction — public housing, HOME-assisted housing, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) projects, and others — Section 3 compliance isn't optional. HUD monitors compliance, and a contractor with persistent compliance shortfalls can be barred from future HUD work. The specific benchmarks, worker eligibility rules, and reporting requirements differ from other federal compliance regimes and are worth understanding separately.
The rules define specific categories of workers who count toward Section 3 benchmarks:
Section 3 worker categories
- Section 3 worker — any worker whose income is below the income limit established by HUD for the area, or who is employed by a Section 3 business concern
- Targeted Section 3 worker — narrower category with additional criteria, including residents of public housing, residents of the service area of the HUD-assisted project, and YouthBuild program participants
The income limit is a key qualifier. A worker earning above the HUD-established income limit for their area generally doesn't count as a Section 3 worker even if they live in a low-income area. Contractors document worker eligibility through documentation the worker provides — typically a Section 3 worker certification form signed by the worker.
Targeted Section 3 workers are a subset with additional characteristics. Meeting Targeted Section 3 benchmarks requires more intensive recruitment from specific groups — public housing residents, area residents, YouthBuild graduates — than general Section 3 workers.
The current HUD regulations (implementing a 2020 rule update that moved Section 3 from a "best efforts" framework to specific numerical benchmarks) establish:
Section 3 labor hours benchmarks
- 25% of total labor hours on the project must be worked by Section 3 workers
- 5% of total labor hours on the project must be worked by Targeted Section 3 workers (subset of the 25%)
These are project-level benchmarks applied to total labor hours across the prime and all subs. Contractors reaching these benchmarks are considered to have met the obligation; contractors falling short must demonstrate that they took qualitative efforts toward the Section 3 objectives — outreach to residents and Section 3 businesses, coordination with local workforce development, targeted recruiting, and similar efforts.
A contractor who misses the benchmarks without documented qualitative efforts faces compliance findings. A contractor who misses the benchmarks but documents substantial qualitative efforts may pass scrutiny despite the shortfall.
Section 3 also encourages contracting with Section 3 business concerns — entities that are owned by or substantially employ Section 3 workers. Categories include:
Section 3 business concern categories
- 51%+ ownership by low-income persons, public housing residents, or YouthBuild participants
- Businesses where 75%+ of labor hours are worked by Section 3 workers
- Businesses with at least 75% of employees meeting Section 3 worker criteria
Prime contractors are encouraged to seek out Section 3 businesses as subcontractors. The specific benchmarks for Section 3 business engagement are less rigid than the labor hours benchmarks, but qualitative evidence of outreach to Section 3 businesses is a core part of compliance documentation.
Section 3 obligations flow through the contracting chain. Each prime contractor must include Section 3 language in its subcontracts, and subs are subject to the same obligations. The prime is responsible for aggregating sub-level Section 3 data for project-level reporting.
This creates practical coordination requirements: primes need their subs to collect Section 3 worker certifications, track labor hours by Section 3 status, and report accurately. A prime whose subs don't produce compliant Section 3 data is likely to miss project-level benchmarks.
Contractors on Section 3 covered projects typically report:
Section 3 reporting requirements
- Project-specific Section 3 plans at project start — outlining intended approach to meeting benchmarks
- Quarterly labor hours reports showing Section 3 and Targeted Section 3 worker hours
- Annual aggregate reporting to HUD by the public housing authority or funding agency
- Project closeout reports documenting final compliance status
Reports are submitted to the agency administering the HUD funds (public housing authority, community development agency) rather than directly to HUD. The agency typically aggregates contractor reports into its own reporting to HUD. This creates double reporting — contractors report to the agency, the agency reports to HUD.
Meeting Section 3 benchmarks requires active recruitment strategy. Contractors successful with Section 3 typically:
Get AP insights in your inbox
A short monthly roundup of construction AP + accounting posts. No spam, ever.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Effective Section 3 recruitment practices
- Partner with local workforce development boards and community-based organizations
- Engage with public housing authorities for resident referrals
- Participate in YouthBuild and similar pre-apprenticeship programs
- Post job openings with Section 3-focused recruitment sources
- Attend community hiring fairs in project service areas
- Coordinate with registered apprenticeship programs that serve low-income communities
- Build relationships with minority and women-owned businesses that qualify as Section 3 business concerns
Contractors that treat Section 3 recruitment as a one-off project exercise tend to miss benchmarks. Contractors that build long-term community relationships and referral pipelines consistently meet benchmarks because they have a trained pool to draw from.
Section 3 compliance is easier for contractors with established relationships in the project community. A contractor entering a new market without those relationships often struggles to meet benchmarks on their first few projects. Pre-project relationship building — connecting with workforce development, public housing authorities, and Section 3 businesses before bids are submitted — pays off in benchmark achievement.
Section 3 compliance is documentation-intensive. Contractors need to maintain:
Section 3 documentation requirements
- Section 3 worker self-certification forms signed by eligible workers
- Labor hours records broken down by Section 3 and Targeted Section 3 status
- Section 3 business concern certifications for contracting decisions
- Records of outreach efforts — job postings, community contacts, referral partnerships
- Records of Section 3 plan implementation and progress tracking
In an audit, HUD or the administering agency reviews these records to assess compliance. Contractors without complete documentation often fail audit even if their actual practice would have met benchmarks — the documentation gap itself becomes the compliance finding.
HUD Section 3 enforcement can include:
Section 3 enforcement consequences
- Technical assistance and corrective action requirements on current projects
- Withholding of contract payments pending compliance
- Contract cancellation in serious cases
- Referrals to OFCCP for potential EO 11246 enforcement if Section 3 failures also implicate EEO issues
- Debarment from future HUD work for persistent or willful violations
Most Section 3 findings lead to corrective action rather than debarment. Debarment is reserved for egregious cases — willful non-compliance, falsified records, retaliation against Section 3 workers. But the pattern of findings can affect a contractor's reputation and competitive position for future HUD opportunities, even without formal debarment.
HUD-assisted construction typically triggers multiple overlapping federal compliance regimes:
Overlapping federal requirements on HUD-assisted construction
- Davis-Bacon prevailing wage — applies to most HUD-assisted construction over $2,000
- Section 3 hiring preferences — applies to HUD Covered Projects over various thresholds
- EO 11246 affirmative action (historically) — applies to federal contractors with applicable thresholds
- Section 504 accessibility — applies to the projects being built
- Fair Housing Act — applies to marketing and occupancy of the housing
Compliance infrastructure for one regime often supports compliance with others. A contractor with strong workforce diversity recruitment for Section 3 typically also performs well on OFCCP utilization goals. Contractors new to HUD work often underestimate the cumulative compliance load and under-resource the compliance function.
HUD Section 3 requires contractors on HUD-assisted construction to direct economic opportunities to low-income residents and Section 3 businesses, with specific numerical benchmarks for Section 3 worker labor hours (25%) and Targeted Section 3 worker hours (5%). Compliance flows through subcontractors, requires quarterly reporting, and depends on pre-existing recruitment relationships with workforce development partners, public housing authorities, and community-based organizations. Contractors new to HUD-assisted construction often underestimate the compliance infrastructure needed — Section 3 sits alongside Davis-Bacon, accessibility, and other federal requirements that together shape how the work must be staffed and documented. Contractors serious about sustained participation in HUD-assisted markets invest in community relationships and documentation systems before they need them, not after the first benchmark shortfall triggers corrective action.
Written by
Jordan Patel
Compliance & Legal
Former corporate counsel specializing in construction contracts and tax compliance. Writes about the documentation layer — COIs, W-8/W-9, certified payroll, notice-to-owner deadlines — and the legal backbone behind audit-ready AP.
View all posts